The CHEA Initiative
| creative, original | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| adoptable, replicable | No Ratings |
| promises impact, influence | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| inspires, motivates change | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| paradigm shifting, game changing | ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Why is it innovative?
A multi-year national conversation on the future of accreditation. The Initiative seeks to (1) enhance accountability in accreditation and (2) sustain a balance and distinction between accountability to the federal government and the academic work of accreditation.
More Information
From the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) website:
In the third year of the CHEA Initiative, the focus shifts to action. CHEA will host several national accreditation fora during which participants will review the national conversation to date and begin to frame action plans focused initially on steps that institutions and accrediting organizations can take in the eight areas that have been identified. This will also assist with preparation for the next reauthorization of the Higher Education Act. As in the past, participants will include institutional leaders, accreditors, students, government, the public and the press.
The action plan development will begin with a CHEA Fall Forum, followed by additional deliberation at the 2011 CHEA Annual Conference, a likely Spring Forum and completion of the action plans at the 2011 CHEA Summer Workshop. Information about these events will be forthcoming.





September 21st, 2010 - 03:50
The american higher ed accreditation process is in need of an interactive infographic: what? why? who? how? where? NACIQI, CHEA, regional accreditation associations, discipline specific associations, state-level programmatic requirements, etc. After two years of conducting conversations, CHEA “shifts to action” with a 3rd year of fora and more conversations. What does this all mean for higher ed? It’s anyone’s guess.
September 21st, 2010 - 06:05
At least CHEA is leading a conversation. Gregl’s right that we all need more clarity about accreditation and its role. I’m hopeful that this conversation will lead to some clarity–not just for institutions but also for those outside higher ed. So I’m giving it 4 for “promises impact, influence.” We’re going to have to see what the much-anticipated action plan includes.